Decreased patient discharges on weekends part 3: what do the leaders tell us?

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a significant challenge to providing safe and quality care to patients. We know that hospital and ED crowding is exacerbated on Mondays because fewer in-patients are discharged on the weekend. We evaluated barriers and potential solutions to improve in-patient flow and diminished weekend discharges, in hopes of decreasing the severe ED crowding observed on Mondays. METHODS: In this observational study, we conducted interviews of (a) leaders at The Ottawa Hospital, a major academic health sciences centre (nursing, allied health, physicians), and (b) leaders of community facilities (long-term care and chronic hospital) that receive patients from the hospital, and (c) home care. Each interview was conducted individually and addressed perceived barriers to the discharge of hospital in-patients on weekends as well as potential solutions. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted whereby themes were organized into a summary table of barriers and solutions. RESULTS: We interviewed 40 leaders including 30 nursing, physician, and allied health leaders from the hospital as well as 10 senior personnel from community facilities and home care. Many barriers to weekend discharges were identified, highlighting that this problem is complex with many interdependent internal and external factors. Fortunately, many specific potential solutions were suggested, in immediate, short-term and long-term time horizons. While many solutions require additional resources, others require a culture change whereby hospital and community stakeholders recognize that services must be provided consistently, seven days a week. INTERPRETATION: We have identified the complex and interdependent barriers to weekend discharges of in-patients. There are numerous specific opportunities for hospital staff and services, physicians, and community facilities to provide the same patient care on weekends as on weekdays. This will lead to improved patient flow and safety, and to decreased ED crowding on Mondays.

ABSTRAIT: CONTEXTE: Le surpeuplement des services d'urgence (SU) est un défi important pour fournir des soins sécuritaires et de qualité aux patients. Nous savons que le surpeuplement des hôpitaux et des urgences est exacerbé le lundi parce que moins de patients hospitalisés reçoivent leur congé le week-end. Nous avons évalué les obstacles et les solutions potentielles pour améliorer le flux de patients hospitalisés et diminuer les congés de fin de semaine, dans l'espoir de réduire le surpeuplement sévère observé le lundi. MéTHODES: Dans cette étude observationnelle, nous avons interviewé (a) des dirigeants de l'Hôpital d'Ottawa, un important centre universitaire des sciences de la santé (soins infirmiers, soins paramédicaux, médecins), et (b) des dirigeants d'établissements communautaires (soins de longue durée et hôpitaux de soins chroniques) qui reçoivent des patients de l'hôpital et (c) des soins à domicile. Chaque entrevue a été menée individuellement et a abordé les obstacles perçus au congé des patients hospitalisés le week-end ainsi que les solutions potentielles. Une analyse thématique inductive a été menée, dans le cadre de laquelle les thèmes ont été organisés en un tableau récapitulatif des obstacles et des solutions RéSULTATS: Nous avons interviewé 40 dirigeants, dont 30 chefs de file des soins infirmiers, des médecins et des professions paramédicales de l'hôpital, ainsi que 10 cadres supérieurs d'établissements communautaires et de soins à domicile. De nombreux obstacles aux congés de fin de semaine ont été cernés, ce qui souligne que ce problème est complexe et qu'il comporte de nombreux facteurs internes et externes interdépendants. Heureusement, de nombreuses solutions potentielles spécifiques ont été proposées, à court terme et à long terme. Bien que de nombreuses solutions exigent des ressources supplémentaires, d'autres exigent un changement de culture par lequel les intervenants hospitaliers et communautaires reconnaissent que les services doivent être fournis de façon uniforme, sept jours par semaine. INTERPRéTATION: Nous avons identifié les obstacles complexes et interdépendants aux sorties de fin de semaine des patients hospitalisés. Il existe de nombreuses possibilités précises pour le personnel et les services hospitaliers, les médecins et les établissements communautaires d'offrir les mêmes soins aux patients les fins de semaine que les jours de semaine. Cela permettra d'améliorer la circulation et la sécurité des patients, et de réduire le surpeuplement des urgences le lundi.

Evaluation of a prehospital endovascular therapy stroke bypass program.

INTRODUCTION: Prehospital stroke endovascular therapy bypass transports patients with suspected large vessel occlusion directly to an endovascular therapy capable center. Our objective was to determine if an endovascular therapy bypass protocol improved access to stroke treatments. Secondary objectives were to determine safety, effectiveness, and rate of subsequent interfacility transfers. METHODS: Endovascular therapy bypass in 2018 was implemented in Eastern Ontario, for patients with a Los-Angeles-Motor-Scale ≥ 4 (positive large vessel occlusion screen) with a 90-min transport time if < 6 h from last seen well. A before-after health record review was conducted from Dec 1, 2017 to Nov 30, 2019. A piloted data form was used to extract demographics, times, primary outcomes (endovascular therapy and intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) rate), and secondary outcomes (redirect to closer hospital, airway intervention, and subsequent interfacility transfer). We present descriptive statistics and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) from multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We included 379 stroke patients (165 pre and 214 post-implementation). The endovascular therapy rate between groups was similar (14.1% vs 15.1%). The bypass had an OR of 0.98 (95% CI 0.54-1.78) for receiving endovascular therapy. IV tPA was given to 25.4% of patients pre vs 27.4% post-implementation (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.65-1.74). No patients became unstable during transport, only one patient had an intubation attempt. The inappropriate bypass (false positive) rate was 12.7% pre vs 12.8% post-implementation (positive predictive value 87%). The bypass protocol had an OR of 1.06 (95% CI 0.58-1.95) for subsequent interfacility transfer with a mean of 2.7 h at the community site before transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular therapy stroke bypass with 90-min transport radius and Los-Angeles-Motor-Scale ≥ 4 was safe and well executed by paramedics. Our study did not show any difference in endovascular therapy rate from its implementation. The IV tPA rate was similar between groups despite potentially bypassing thrombolysis capable centers.

ABSTRAIT: INTRODUCTION: Le pontage de la thérapie endovasculaire pré-hospitalière transporte les patients présentant une occlusion suspectée de gros vaisseaux directement vers un centre capable de thérapie endovasculaire. Notre objectif était de déterminer si un protocole de pontage endovasculaire améliore l'accès aux traitements d'AVC. Les objectifs secondaires étaient de déterminer l'innocuité, l'efficacité et le taux des transferts d'interfacilité subséquents. MéTHODES: Le pontage par thérapie endovasculaire en 2018 a été mis en œuvre dans l'Est de l'Ontario, pour les patients ayant un test Los-Angeles-Motor-Scale 4 (test positif d'occlusion des gros vaisseaux) avec un temps de transport de 90 minutes si < 6 heures après la dernière observation. Un examen du dossier de santé avant-après a été effectué du 1er décembre 2017 au 30 novembre 2019. Un formulaire de données pilote a été utilisé pour extraire les données démographiques, les heures, les résultats primaires (traitement endovasculaire et taux d'activation du plasminogène par voie intraveineuse (IV) et les résultats secondaires (réorientation vers un hôpital plus proche, intervention sur les voies respiratoires et transfert d'interfacilité subséquent). Nous présentons des statistiques descriptives et des rapports de cotes (RC) avec des intervalles de confiance (IC) à 95 % à partir d'une régression logistique multivariée. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 379 AVC (165 avant et 214 après la mise en œuvre). Le taux de traitement endovasculaire entre les groupes était similaire (14,1 % vs 15,1 %). Le pontage avait un RC de 0,98 (IC à 95 %, 0,54-1,78) pour le traitement endovasculaire. Le tPA IV a été administré à 25,4% des patients avant vs 27,4% après la mise en œuvre (OR 1,06, 95%CI 0,65-1,74). Aucun patient n'est devenu instable pendant le transport, seulement 1 patient a eu une tentative d'intubation. Le taux de pontage inapproprié (faux positif) était de 12,7 % avant et de 12,8 % après la mise en œuvre (valeur prédictive positive de 87 %). Le protocole de contournement avait un RC de 1,06 (IC à 95 % 0,58-1,95) pour le transfert d'interfacilité ultérieur avec une moyenne de 2,7 heures sur le site de la communauté avant le transfert. CONCLUSIONS: Le pontage d'AVC de thérapie endovasculaire avec un rayon de transport de 90 minutes et Los-Angeles-Motor-Scale 4 était sûr et bien exécuté par les ambulanciers. Notre étude n'a montré aucune différence dans le taux de thérapie endovasculaire par rapport à sa mise en œuvre. Le taux de tPA IV était similaire entre les groupes malgré le fait que les centres capables de contourner la thrombolyse étaient potentiellement contournés.

Incidence and outcomes of emergency department patients requiring emergency general surgery: a 5-year retrospective cohort study.

AIMS: Patients undergoing emergency general surgery are at high risk of complications and death. Our objectives were to estimate the incidence of emergency general surgery in a Swiss University Hospital, to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing such procedures, and to study the impact of age on clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who visited the emergency department (ED) of Geneva University Hospitals between January 2015 and December 2019. Routinely collected data were extracted from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was the incidence of emergency general surgery among patients visiting the emergency department, defined as general surgery within three days of emergency department admission. We also assessed demographic characteristics, mortality, intensive care unit admission and patient disposition. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to study the associations of age with intensive care unit (ICU) admission, one-year mortality and dependence at discharge. Age was modelled as a continuous variable using restricted cubic splines and we compared older patients (75th percentile) with younger patients (25th percentile). RESULTS: Between January 2015 and December 2019, a total of 310,914 emergency department visits met our inclusion criteria. Among them, 3592 patients underwent emergency general surgery within 3 days of emergency department admission, yielding an annual incidence of 116 events per 10,000 emergency department visits (95% CI: 112-119), with a higher incidence in females and young patients. Overall, 5.3% of patients were admitted to ICU, 7.8% were dependent on rehabilitation or assisted living at discharge and 4.8% were dead after one year. Older patients had a higher risk of ICU admission (adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 2.9 [1.5-5.4]), dependence at discharge (aRR 15.3 [5.5-42.4]) and one-year mortality (aRR 5.4 [2.2-13.4]). CONCLUSION: Emergency department visits resulting in emergency general surgery are frequent, but their incidence decreases with patient age. Mortality, ICU admission and dependence at discharge following emergency general surgery are more frequent in older patients. Taking into account the increased risk for older patients, a shared process is appropriate for making more informed decisions about their options for care.

Pharmacological agents for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department and intensive care unit: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of various i.v. pharmacologic agents used for procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in the emergency department (ED) and ICU. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to enable direct and indirect comparisons between available medications. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed from inception to 2 March 2023 for RCTs comparing two or more procedural sedation and analgesia medications in all patients (adults and children >30 days of age) requiring emergent procedures in the ED or ICU. We focused on the outcomes of sedation recovery time, patient satisfaction, and adverse events (AEs). We performed frequentist random-effects model network meta-analysis and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate certainty in estimates. RESULTS: We included 82 RCTs (8105 patients, 78 conducted in the ED and four in the ICU) of which 52 studies included adults, 23 included children, and seven included both. Compared with midazolam-opioids, recovery time was shorter with propofol (mean difference 16.3 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.4-24.3 fewer minutes; high certainty), and patient satisfaction was better with ketamine-propofol (mean difference 1.5 points, 95% CI 0.3-2.6 points, high certainty). Regarding AEs, compared with midazolam-opioids, respiratory AEs were less frequent with ketamine (relative risk [RR] 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.96; high certainty), gastrointestinal AEs were more common with ketamine-midazolam (RR 3.08, 95% CI 1.15-8.27; high certainty), and neurological AEs were more common with ketamine-propofol (RR 3.68, 95% CI 1.08-12.53; high certainty). CONCLUSION: When considering procedural sedation and analgesia in the ED and ICU, compared with midazolam-opioids, sedation recovery time is shorter with propofol, patient satisfaction is better with ketamine-propofol, and respiratory adverse events are less common with ketamine.

Test Characteristics of Emergency Medicine-Performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Acute cholecystitis accounts for up to 9% of hospital admissions for acute abdominal pain, and best practice entails early surgical management. Ultrasound is the standard modality used to confirm diagnosis. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of emergency physician-performed point-of-care ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis when compared with a reference standard of final diagnosis (informed by available surgical pathology, discharge diagnosis, and radiology-performed ultrasound). We completed a systematic review and meta-analysis, registered in PROSPERO, in adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched 7 databases as well as gray literature in the form of select conference abstracts from inception to February 8, 2023. Two independent reviewers completed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias (QUADAS-2) assessment. Disagreements were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Data were extracted from eligible studies to create 2 × 2 tables for diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis. Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic models were constructed. Of 1855 titles/abstracts, 40 were selected for full-text review. Ten studies (n=2356) were included. Emergency physician-performed point-of-care ultrasound with final diagnosis as the reference standard (7 studies, n=1,772) had a pooled sensitivity of 70.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 62.3 to 78.2), specificity of 94.4% (95% CI 88.2 to 97.5), positive likelihood ratio of 12.7 (5.8 to 27.5), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.31 (0.23 to 0.41) for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Emergency physician-performed point-of-care ultrasound has high specificity and moderate sensitivity for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis in patients with clinical suspicion. This review supports the use of emergency physician-performed point-of-care ultrasound to rule in a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis in the emergency department, which may help expedite definitive management.

Lack of association between four biomarkers and persistent post-concussion symptoms after a mild traumatic brain injury.

Approximately 15 % of individuals who sustained a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) develop persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS). We hypothesized that blood biomarkers drawn in the Emergency Department (ED) could help predict PPCS. The main objective of this project was to measure the association between four biomarkers and PPCS at 90 days post mild TBI. We conducted a prospective cohort study in seven Canadian EDs. Patients aged ≥ 14 years presenting to the ED within 24 h of a mild TBI who were discharged were eligible. Clinical data and blood samples were collected in the ED, and a standardized questionnaire was administered 90 days later to assess the presence of symptoms. The following biomarkers were analyzed: S100B protein, Neuron Specific Enolase (NSE), cleaved-Tau (c-Tau) and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP). The primary outcome measure was the presence of PPCS at 90 days after trauma. Relative risks and Areas Under the Curve (AUC) were computed. A total of 595 patients were included, and 13.8 % suffered from PPCS at 90 days. The relative risk of PPCS was 0.9 (95 % CI: 0.5-1.8) for S100B ≥ 20 pg/mL, 1.0 (95 % CI: 0.6-1.5) for NSE ≥ 200 pg/mL, 3.4 (95 % CI: 0.5-23.4) for GFAP ≥ 100 pg/mL, and 1.0 (95 % CI: 0.6-1.8) for C-Tau ≥ 1500 pg/mL. AUC were 0.50, 0.50, 0.51 and 0.54, respectively. Among mild TBI patients, S100B protein, NSE, c-Tau or GFAP do not seem to predict PPCS. Future research testing of other biomarkers is needed to determine their usefulness in predicting PPCS.

Comparing methods to classify admitted patients with SARS-CoV-2 as admitted for COVID-19 versus with incidental SARS-CoV-2: A cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Not all patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection develop symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), making it challenging to assess the burden of COVID-19-related hospitalizations and mortality. We aimed to determine the proportion, resource utilization, and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients admitted for COVID-19, and assess the impact of using the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) discharge diagnosis-based algorithm and the Massachusetts state department's drug administration-based classification system on identifying admissions for COVID-19. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled consecutive SARS-CoV-2 positive patients admitted to one of five hospitals in British Columbia between December 19, 2021 and May 31,2022. We completed medical record reviews, and classified hospitalizations as being primarily for COVID-19 or with incidental SARS-CoV-2 infection. We applied the CDC algorithm and the Massachusetts classification to estimate the difference in hospital days, intensive care unit (ICU) days and in-hospital mortality and calculated sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Of 42,505 Emergency Department patients, 1,651 were admitted and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, with 858 (52.0%, 95% CI 49.6-54.4) admitted for COVID-19. Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 required ICU admission (14.0% versus 8.2%, p<0.001) and died (12.6% versus 6.4%, p<0.001) more frequently compared with patients with incidental SARS-CoV-2. Compared to case classification by clinicians, the CDC algorithm had a sensitivity of 82.9% (711/858, 95% CI 80.3%, 85.4%) and specificity of 98.1% (778/793, 95% CI 97.2%, 99.1%) for COVID-19-related admissions and underestimated COVID-19 attributable hospital days. The Massachusetts classification had a sensitivity of 60.5% (519/858, 95% CI 57.2%, 63.8%) and specificity of 78.6% (623/793, 95% CI 75.7%, 81.4%) for COVID-19-related admissions, underestimating total number of hospital and ICU bed days while overestimating COVID-19-related intubations, ICU admissions, and deaths. CONCLUSION: Half of SARS-CoV-2 hospitalizations were for COVID-19 during the Omicron wave. The CDC algorithm was more specific and sensitive than the Massachusetts classification, but underestimated the burden of COVID-19 admissions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04702945.

Ninety-Day Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Recurrence in Patients Prescribed Anticoagulation in the Emergency Department With Atrial Fibrillation and a New Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke.

Background For patients with atrial fibrillation seen in the emergency department (ED) following a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke, the impact of initiating oral anticoagulation immediately rather than deferring the decision to outpatient follow-up is unknown. Methods and Results We conducted a planned secondary data analysis of a prospective cohort of 11 507 adults in 13 Canadian EDs between 2006 and 2018. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, with a final diagnosis of TIA or minor stroke with previously documented or newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation. The primary outcome was subsequent stroke, recurrent TIA, or all-cause mortality within 90 days of the index TIA diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included stroke, recurrent TIA, or death and rates of major bleeding. Of 11 507 subjects with TIA/minor stroke, atrial fibrillation was identified in 11.2% (1286, mean age, 77.3 [SD 11.1] years, 52.4% male). Over half (699; 54.4%) were already taking anticoagulation, 89 (6.9%) were newly prescribed anticoagulation in the ED. By 90 days, 4.0% of the atrial fibrillation cohort had experienced a subsequent stroke, 6.5% subsequent TIA, and 2.6% died. Results of a multivariable logistic regression indicate no association between prescribed anticoagulation in the ED and these 90-day outcomes (composite odds ratio, 1.37 [95% CI, 0.74-2.52]). Major bleeding was found in 5 patients, none of whom were in the ED-initiated anticoagulation group. Conclusions Initiating oral anticoagulation in the ED following new TIA was not associated with lower recurrence rates of neurovascular events or all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Agreement and prognostic accuracy of three ED vulnerability screeners: findings from a prospective multi-site cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the agreement between three emergency department (ED) vulnerability screeners, including the InterRAI ED Screener, ER2, and PRISMA-7. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the discriminative accuracy of screeners in predicting discharge home and extended ED lengths-of-stay (> 24 h). METHODS: We conducted a nested sub-group study using data from a prospective multi-site cohort study evaluating frailty in older ED patients presenting to four Quebec hospitals. Research nurses assessed patients consecutively with the three screeners. We employed Cohen's Kappa to determine agreement, with high-risk cut-offs of three and four for the PRISMA-7, six for the ER2, and five for the interRAI ED Screener. We used logistic regression to evaluate the discriminative accuracy of instruments, testing them in their dichotomous, full, and adjusted forms (adjusting for age, sex, and hospital academic status). RESULTS: We evaluated 1855 older ED patients across the four hospital sites. The mean age of our sample was 84 years. Agreement between the interRAI ED Screener and the ER2 was fair (K = 0.37; 95% CI 0.33-0.40); agreement between the PRISMA-7 and ER2 was also fair (K = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.36-0.43). Agreement between interRAI ED Screener and PRISMA-7 was poor (K = 0.19; 95% CI 0.16-0.22). Using a cut-off of four for PRISMA-7 improved agreement with the ER2 (K = 0.55; 95% CI 0.51-0.59) and the ED Screener (K = 0.32; 95% CI 0.2-0.36). When predicting discharge home, the concordance statistics among models were similar in their dichotomous (c = 0.57-0.61), full (c = 0.61-0.64), and adjusted forms (c = 0.63-0.65), and poor for all models when predicting extended length-of-stay. CONCLUSION: ED vulnerability scores from the three instruments had a fair agreement and were associated with important patient outcomes. The interRAI ED Screener best identifies older ED patients at greatest risk, while the PRISMA-7 and ER2 are more sensitive instruments.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Évaluer la concordance entre trois outils de dépistage de la vulnérabilité des urgences, notamment l'InterRAI ED Screener, ER2 et PRISMA-7. Notre objectif secondaire était d'évaluer la précision discriminative des agents de dépistage dans la prédiction de la sortie à domicile et des durées de séjour prolongées à l'urgence (> 24 heures). MéTHODES: Nous avons mené une étude de sous-groupe emboîtée à partir des données d'une étude de cohorte prospective multi-sites évaluant la fragilité chez les patients plus âgés se présentant aux urgences de quatre hôpitaux québécois. Les infirmières de recherche ont évalué les patients consécutivement avec les trois dépisteurs. Nous avons utilisé le Kappa de Cohen pour déterminer la concordance, avec des seuils de risque élevé de trois et quatre pour le PRISMA-7, de six pour l'ER2 et de cinq pour l' interRAI ED Screener. Nous avons utilisé la régression logistique pour évaluer la précision discriminante des instruments, en les testant dans leur forme dichotomique, complète et ajustée (en ajustant pour l'âge, le sexe et le statut académique). RéSULTATS: Nous avons évalué 1 855 patients âgés aux urgences dans les quatre sites hospitaliers. L'âge moyen de notre échantillon était de 84 ans. La concordance entre l'interRAI ED Screener et l'ER2 était équitable (K =0,37 ; IC à 95 % =0,33-0,40) ; la concordance entre le PRISMA-7 et l'ER2 était également équitable (K = 0,39 ; IC à 95 % =0,36-0,43). La concordance entre interRAI ED Screener et PRISMA-7 était faible (K = 0,19 ; IC à 95 % = 0,16-0,22). L'utilisation d'un seuil de quatre pour PRISMA-7 a amélioré la concordance avec l'ER2 (K =0,55 ; IC à 95% =0,51-0,59) et l'ED Screener (K =0,32 ; IC à 95 % =0,2-0,36). En ce qui concerne la prédiction du retour à domicile, les statistiques de concordance entre les modèles étaient similaires dans leurs formes dichotomiques (c = 0,57-0,61), complètes (c =0,61-0,64) et ajustées (c =0,63-0,65), et faibles pour tous les modèles en ce qui concerne la prédiction de la durée de séjour prolongée. CONCLUSION: Les scores de vulnérabilité aux urgences des trois instruments concordaient assez bien et étaient associés à des résultats importants pour les patients.

Prospective Validation of Computed Tomography to Identify Patients at High Risk for Stroke After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) findings of acute and chronic ischemia are associated with subsequent stroke risk in patients with transient ischemic attack. We sought to validate these associations in a large prospective cohort of patients with transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled emergency department patients from 13 hospitals with transient ischemic attack who had CT imaging. Primary outcome was stroke within 90 days. Secondary outcomes were stroke within 2 or 7 days. CT findings were abstracted from radiology reports and classified for the presence of acute ischemia, chronic ischemia, or microangiopathy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test associations with primary and secondary end points. RESULTS: From 8670 prospectively enrolled patients between May 2010 and May 2017, 8382 had a CT within 24 hours. From this total population, 4547 (54%) patients had evidence of acute ischemia, chronic ischemia, or microangiopathy on CT, of whom 175 had a subsequent stroke within 90 days (3.8% subsequent stroke rate; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.33 [95% CI, 1.62-3.36]). This was in comparison to those with CT imaging without ischemia. Findings associated with an increased risk of stroke at 90 days were isolated acute ischemia (6.0%; aOR, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.03-5.66]), acute ischemia with microangiopathy (10.7%; aOR, 3.34 [95% CI, 1.57-7.14]), chronic ischemia with microangiopathy (5.2%; aOR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.34-2.50]), and acute ischemia with chronic ischemia and microangiopathy (10.9%; aOR, 3.49 [95% CI, 1.54-7.91]). Acute ischemia with chronic ischemia and microangiopathy were most strongly associated with subsequent stroke within 2 days (aOR, 4.36 [95% CI, 1.31-14.54]) and 7 days (aOR, 4.50 [95% CI, 1.73-11.69]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with transient ischemic attack or minor stroke, CT evidence of acute ischemia with chronic ischemia or microangiopathy significantly increases the risk of subsequent stroke within 90 days of index visit. The combination of all 3 findings results in the greatest early risk.

High-dose cephalexin for cellulitis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Up to 3% of all Emergency Department (ED) visits are due to skin and soft tissue infections such as non-purulent cellulitis. The current treatment failure rate is approximately 20%. Evidence is lacking regarding the optimal outpatient management of cellulitis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of a randomized trial comparing high-dose (1000 mg) to standard-dose (500 mg) cephalexin to treat ED patients with cellulitis. METHODS: A parallel arm double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial conducted at two EDs in Canada. Eligible participants were adults (age ≥ 18 years) presenting to the ED with non-purulent cellulitis and determined by the treating emergency physician to be eligible for outpatient management with oral antibiotics. Participants were randomized to high-dose or standard-dose cephalexin four times daily for 7 days. The primary feasibility outcome was participant recruitment rate (target ≥ 35%). The preliminary primary effectiveness outcome was oral antibiotic treatment failure. RESULTS: Of 134 eligible participants approached for trial participation, 69 (51.5%, 95% CI 43.1 to 59.8%) were recruited and randomized. After excluding three randomized participants due to an alternate diagnosis, 33 participants were included in each arm. Nineteen eligible cases (14.2%) were missed. Loss to follow-up was 6.1%. Treatment failure occurred in four patients (12.9%) in the standard-dose arm versus one patient (3.2%) in the high-dose arm. A greater proportion had minor adverse events in the high-dose arm. No patients had an unplanned hospitalization within 14 days. CONCLUSION: This pilot randomized controlled trial comparing high-dose to standard-dose cephalexin for ED patients with cellulitis demonstrated a high participant recruitment rate and that a full-scale trial is feasible. High-dose cephalexin had fewer treatment failures but with a higher proportion of minor adverse effects. The findings of this pilot will be used to inform the design of a future large trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04471246).

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Jusqu'à 3% de toutes les visites aux urgences sont dues à des infections de la peau et des tissus mous, comme la cellulite non purulente. Le taux actuel d'échec du traitement est d'environ 20%. Il manque des données probantes sur la gestion optimale de la cellulite en consultation externe. OBJECTIFS: Évaluer la faisabilité d'un essai randomisé comparant la céfalexine à dose élevée (1000 mg) à la céfalexine à dose normale (500 mg) pour traiter les patients des urgences atteints de cellulite. MéTHODES: Un essai pilote contrôlé randomisé en double aveugle à bras parallèles mené dans deux services d'urgence au Canada. Les participants éligibles étaient des adultes (âge ≥ 18 ans) se présentant aux urgences avec une cellulite non purulente et déterminés par l'urgentiste traitant comme pouvant bénéficier d'une prise en charge ambulatoire par antibiotiques oraux. Les participants ont été randomisés entre la céfalexine à dose élevée et la céfalexine à dose normale, quatre fois par jour pendant 7 jours. Le résultat primaire de faisabilité était le taux de recrutement des participants (objectif ≥ 35%). Le résultat primaire préliminaire d'efficacité était l'échec du traitement antibiotique oral. RéSULTATS: Sur les 134 participants éligibles sollicités pour participer à l'essai, 69 (51,5%, IC à 95% 43,1% à 59,8%) ont été recrutés et randomisés. Après avoir exclu trois participants randomisés en raison d'un autre diagnostic, 33 participants au total ont été inclus dans chaque bras. Au total, 19 cas éligibles (14,2%) ont été manqués. Le taux de perte au suivi était de 6,1%. L'échec du traitement est survenu chez quatre patients (12,9%) dans le groupe à dose standard contre un patient (3,2%) dans le groupe à dose élevée. Une plus grande proportion de patients ont eu des effets indésirables mineurs dans le groupe à forte dose. Aucun patient n'a été hospitalisé de façon imprévue dans les 14 jours. CONCLUSION: Cet essai pilote randomisé et contrôlé comparant la céphalexine à dose élevée à la céfalexine à dose normale pour les patients des urgences atteints de cellulite a démontré un taux élevé de recrutement de participants et la faisabilité d'un essai à grande échelle. La céfalexine à forte dose a entraîné moins d'échecs thérapeutiques, mais avec une proportion plus élevée d'effets indésirables mineurs. Les résultats de ce projet pilote serviront de base à la conception d'un futur essai à grande échelle. INSCRIPTION à L'ESSAI: Cet essai a été enregistré sur ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04471246).

Examining the utility and accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department Screener in identifying high-risk older emergency department patients: A Canadian multiprovince prospective cohort study.

Objectives: We set out to determine the accuracy of the interRAI Emergency Department (ED) Screener in predicting the need for detailed geriatric assessment in the ED. Our secondary objective was to determine the discriminative ability of the interRAI ED Screener for predicting the odds of discharge home and extended ED length of stay (>24 hours). Methods: We conducted a multiprovince prospective cohort study in Canada. The need for detailed geriatric assessment was determined using the interRAI ED Screener and the interRAI ED Contact Assessment as the reference standard. A score of ≥5 was used to classify high-risk patients. Assessments were conducted by emergency and research nurses. We calculated the sensitivity, positive predictive value, and false discovery rate of the interRAI ED Screener. We employed logistic regression to predict ED outcomes while adjusting for age, sex, academic status, and the province of care. Results: A total of 5629 older ED patients across 11 ED sites were evaluated using the interRAI ED Screener and 1061 were evaluated with the interRAI ED Contact Assessment. Approximately one-third of patients were discharged home or experienced an extended ED length of stay. The interRAI ED Screener had a sensitivity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 82%, and a false discovery rate of 18%. The interRAI ED Screener predicted discharge home and extended ED length of stay with fair accuracy. Conclusion: The interRAI ED Screener is able to accurately and rapidly identify individuals with medical complexity. The interRAI ED Screener predicts patient-important health outcomes in older ED patients, highlighting its value for vulnerability screening.

Practice Variation among Canadian Stroke Prevention Clinics: Pre, During, and Post-COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a common and serious disorder. With optimal care, 90-day recurrent stroke risk can be reduced from 10% to about 1%. Stroke prevention clinics (SPCs) can improve patient outcomes and resource allocation but lack standardization in patient management. The extent of variation in patient management among SPCs is unknown. Our aims were to assess baseline practice variation between Canadian SPCs and the impact of COVID-19 on SPC patient care. METHODS: We conducted an electronic survey of 80 SPCs across Canada from May to November 2021. SPC leads were contacted by email with up to five reminders. RESULTS: Of 80 SPCs contacted, 76 were eligible from which 38 (50.0%) responded. The majority (65.8%) of SPCs are open 5 or more days a week. Tests are more likely to be completed before the SPC visit if referrals were from clinic's own emergency department compared to other referring sources. COVID-19 had a negative impact on routine patient care including longer wait times (increased for 36.4% clinics) and higher number of patients without completed bloodwork prior to arriving for appointments (increased for 27.3% clinics). During COVID-19 pandemic, 87.9% of SPCs provided virtual care while 72.7% plan to continue with virtual care post-COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Despite the time-sensitive nature of transient ischemic attack patient management, some SPCs in Canada are not able to see patients quickly. SPCs should endeavor to implement strategies so that they can see high-risk patients within the highest risk timeline and implement strategies to complete some tests while waiting for SPC appointment.